Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
These examples show several common methods that Wikipedia editors use to make their articles verifiable. Wikipedia editors are free to use any of these methods, or to develop newer methods—no particular method is preferred. However some method is required and each article must use the same method throughout the entire article. (When making ...
To request verification that a reference supports the text, tag it with {{verification needed}}. Material that fails verification may be tagged with {{ failed verification }} or removed. It helps other editors to explain your rationale for using templates to tag material in the template, edit summary, or on the talk page.
Verification is intended to check that a product, service, or system meets a set of design specifications. [6] [7] In the development phase, verification procedures involve performing special tests to model or simulate a portion, or the entirety, of a product, service, or system, then performing a review or analysis of the modeling results.
Wikipedia has a comparable process with privileges and a public label. Identity verification is the process of confirming that a Wikimedia contributor's identity matches to some other identity, such as their offline identity, a user account on another website, or another persona such as a person claiming to be a representative of an organization.
Verification and validation, in engineering or quality management systems, is the act of reviewing, inspecting or testing, in order to establish and document that a product, service or system meets regulatory or technical standards
Well, I'm no mathematician, and maybe there is a reason Wikipedia refers to 3.14159 and ln while the book refers to N and log. Or maybe Wikipedia and the book are saying exactly the same thing. Or maybe Wikipedia and the book are saying exactly the same thing.
Verification: "Have we made what we were trying to make?", i.e., does the product conform to the specifications? The verification process consists of static/structural and dynamic/behavioral aspects. E.g., for a software product one can inspect the source code (static) and run against specific test cases (dynamic).
Wikipedia has a reputation for cultivating a culture of fact-checking among its editors. [16] Wikipedia's fact-checking process depends on the activity of its volunteer community of contributors, who numbered 200,000 as of 2018. [1] The development of fact-checking practices is ongoing in the Wikipedia editing community. [6]