When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Relevance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance

    Relevance is the connection between topics that makes one useful for dealing with the other. Relevance is studied in many different fields, including cognitive science, logic, and library and information science. Epistemology studies it in general, and different theories of knowledge have different implications for what is considered relevant.

  3. Wikipedia:Relevance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Relevance

    Relevance level "Medium" – Information that is "once removed" is less directly relevant, should receive a higher level of scrutiny and achieve higher levels in other areas (such as neutrality, weight and strength [further explanation needed] and objectivity of the material and sourcing) before inclusion, but may still may be sufficiently ...

  4. Wikipedia:Relevance emerges - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Relevance_emerges

    On Wikipedia, relevance is simply whether a fact is in the right article, based on whether it pertains to the article's subject. Usually this is obvious. Usually this is obvious. When not obvious, relevance is decided by the editors of the article, based on what is considered likely to be useful to readers.

  5. Relevance (information retrieval) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance_(information...

    The formal study of relevance began in the 20th century with the study of what would later be called bibliometrics. In the 1930s and 1940s, S. C. Bradford used the term "relevant" to characterize articles relevant to a subject (cf., Bradford's law). In the 1950s, the first information retrieval systems emerged, and researchers noted the ...

  6. Wikipedia:Relevance/Review A - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Relevance/Review_A

    Wikipedia:Relevance, as a guideline, is given less weight than the three core policies: Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. If this is needed at all, it should be low on the page.

  7. Wikipedia:Relevance of content - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Relevance_of_content

    The relevance of information is best demonstrated by the provision of reliable sources, and of suitable context. The bulk of Wikipedia's content consists of: Basic description – which explains what the subject is , what it does (or did), and what it is notable for.

  8. Relevance theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance_theory

    Relevance theory also attempts to explain figurative language such as hyperbole, metaphor and irony. Critics have stated that relevance, in the specialised sense used in this theory, is not defined well enough to be measured. Other criticisms include that the theory is too reductionist to account for the large variety of pragmatic phenomena.

  9. Wikipedia:Relevance/Review B - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Relevance/Review_B

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate