Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In linguistics, clusivity [1] is a grammatical distinction between inclusive and exclusive first-person pronouns and verbal morphology, also called inclusive "we" and exclusive "we". Inclusive "we" specifically includes the addressee, while exclusive "we" specifically excludes the addressee; in other words, two (or more) words that both ...
This is in contrast with an exclusive disjunction, which is true when one or the other of the arguments are true, but not both (referred to as exclusive or, or XOR). When it is necessary to clarify whether inclusive or exclusive or is intended, English speakers sometimes uses the phrase and/or.
Some languages distinguish between inclusive and exclusive first-person plural pronouns – those that do and do not include their audience. For example, Tok Pisin has seven first-person pronouns according to number (singular, dual, trial, plural) and clusivity, such as mitripela ("they two and I") and yumitripela ("you two and I").
Some other languages use different classifying systems, especially in the plural pronouns. One frequently found difference not present in most Indo-European languages is a contrast between inclusive and exclusive "we": a distinction of first-person plural pronouns between including or excluding the addressee.
Inclusive may refer to: Inclusive disjunction, A or B or both; Inclusive fitness, in evolutionary theory, how many kin are supported including non-descendants; Inclusive tax, includes taxes owed as part of the base; Inclusivism, a form of religious pluralism; Inclusive first person, in linguistics
The inclusive interpretation is a minority view in some churches but is considered an official theological doctrine in others. [ citation needed ] Christian supporters of inclusivism include Augustus Hopkins Strong , [ 8 ] C. S. Lewis , [ 9 ] [ 10 ] [ 11 ] Clark Pinnock , [ 12 ] Karl Rahner , John E. Sanders , Terrance L. Tiessen, and Robert ...
A cardboard sign calling for inclusive language at a feminist protest in Madrid, 2013, with basic usage instructions. Inclusive language is a language style that seeks to avoid expressions that its proponents perceive as expressing or implying ideas that are sexist, racist, or otherwise biased, prejudiced, or insulting to particular group(s) of people; and instead uses language intended by its ...
As it can be understood from the examples, the particles "at" and "iš" help Lithuanians specify the relation of the movement intended with the deictic centre. As a result of this, different nuances can be obtained from not using these particles, similar to the feeling provided in English by using "I will go to you" vs "I will come to you".