Ads
related to: coastal commission permit lookuppropertyrecord.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The city agreed that its utility will pay the commission's fine of $1.9 million and will follow the restoration order requiring LADWP to apply for a coastal development permit to complete the project and to restore 9 acres (3.6 ha) of habitat within the coastal zone and an additional 17 acres (6.9 ha) outside the zone.
California Coastal Commission v. Granite Rock Co., 480 U.S. 572 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court case addressing the question of whether United States Forest Service regulations, federal land use statutes and regulations, or the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, preempt the California Coastal Commission's imposition of a permit requirement on operation of an unpatented mining claim ...
Granite Rock filed suit, claiming that the Coastal Commission permit requirement was preempted by the Forest Service review. When Granite Rock prevailed in the lower courts, the Coastal Commission appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. California sought to change the division of power between the federal government and the states ...
As such, Space Force officials don't have to obtain a permit or permission from the California Coastal Commission for rocket launches; they only need to reach an agreement to mitigate the effects.
The state's powerful coastal land-use regulator is arguing its awesome development-stopping powers applies to rocket launches as well as housing. Elon Musk Versus the California Coastal Commission ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
As a result, Proposition 20 passed, by a margin of 10% (c. 800,000 votes), [1] thus establishing the California Coastal Commission (CCC). However, it wouldn't be until 1976 that it was formally passed into law by the California State Senate through the adoption of the California Coastal Act of 1976.
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), was a 1987 United States Supreme Court decision that ruled that a California Coastal Commission regulation which required private homeowners to dedicate a public easement along valuable beachfront property as a condition of approval for a construction permit to renovate their beach bungalow was unconstitutional.