When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Court of Tax Appeals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_of_Tax_Appeals

    Hence, the CTA is now composed of one Presiding Justice and eight Associate Justices. The CTA may sit en banc or in three divisions with each division consisting of three justices. The CTA, as one of the courts comprising the Philippine Judiciary, is under the supervision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines .

  3. Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrichs_v._California...

    In the 1977 case Abood v.Detroit Board of Education, the Supreme Court upheld the maintaining of a union shop in a public workplace. Public school teachers in Detroit had sought to overturn the requirement that they pay fees equivalent to union dues on the grounds that they opposed public sector collective bargaining and objected to the ideological activities of the union.

  4. Compañía General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Collector of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compañía_General_de...

    The US Supreme Court held that the tax was lawful. Holmes J dissented on reasoning, not result, joined by Brandeis J.. The plaintiff's reliance is upon Allgeyer v.Louisiana, 165 U. S. 578, 17 S. Ct. 427, 41 L. Ed. 832, in which it was held that a fine could not be imposed by the State for sending a notice similar to the present to an insurance company out of the State.

  5. Regional Transportation Authority (Illinois) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_Transportation...

    In 2004, the CTA, projecting a $55 million funding shortfall in its 2005 budget, called for a "long term funding solution," involving a change to the sales tax distribution formula in the RTA Act. [20] In response, the Illinois General Assembly appropriated $54 million to cover the cost of CTA's paratransit service for 2005. [21]

  6. TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TC_Heartland_LLC_v._Kraft...

    TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the venue in patent infringement lawsuits. [1]While a 1957 Supreme Court ruling had determined that patent infringement cases were to be tried in the state within which the defendant was incorporated, subsequent changes to Judiciary and Judicial Procedure implemented by ...

  7. U-form - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U-form

    Copying a u-form involves the creation of a new u-form (i.e., one with a different UUID), but with all attribute–value pairs identical to those of the original u-form. Replicating a u-form involves creating a new instance of the u-form with the same UUID as the original. Note that in a distributed system, two instances of the same u-form may ...

  8. Chicago Transit Authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Transit_Authority

    The Chicago Transit Authority provides service in Chicago and 10 surrounding suburbs. The CTA provided a total of 532 million rides in 2011, [6] a 3 percent increase over 2010 with ridership rising to levels not seen for 20 years. [7] The CTA operates 24 hours each day and on an average weekday provides 1.7 million rides on buses and trains.

  9. Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cedar_Point_Nursery_v._Hassid

    Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving eminent domain and labor relations. In its decision, the Court held that a regulation made pursuant to the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act that required agricultural employers to allow labor organizers to regularly access their property for the purposes of union recruitment ...