Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Populism has risen the early 21st century; however, the focus is no longer on the general population protesting against the elites, which was historically the case with populism, [9] but rather on more political polarization, whereby a simple majority is the goal of politicians and thus leads to the "tyranny of the majority" in which they do ...
Populism is often defined as an idea within the framework of a liberal democracy that defines two core groups—"the people" and "the elite". [1] Political scientist Cas Mudde defined the core populist concepts with "the people" being presented as a morally good force, while "the elite" are often portrayed as corrupt and self-serving.
The other four were forms of "political populism", representing populist dictatorship, populist democracy, reactionary populism, and politicians' populism. [38] She noted that these were "analytical constructs" and that "real-life examples may well overlap several categories", [ 39 ] adding that no single political movement fitted into all ...
Missouri’s Jack Danforth is right that his Republican Party is gravely ill, but he gets the diagnosis all wrong. | Opinion
Left-wing populism, also called social populism, is a political ideology that combines left-wing politics with populist rhetoric and themes. Its rhetoric often includes elements of anti- elitism , opposition to the Establishment , and speaking for the " common people ". [ 1 ]
Gunn Enli identifies the Internet's effect on public opinion as being “characterised by an intensified personalisation of political advocacy and increased anti-elitism, popularisation and populism”. [16] Public opinion has become more varied as a result of online news sources being influenced by political communication and agenda setting.
If populist movements in 1930s and 1940s Latin America had apparent fascist overtones and based themselves on authoritarian politics, as was the case of Vargas' Estado Novo dictatorship in Brazil (1937–1945), [16] or of some of Peron's openly expressed sympathies, [17] in the 1950s populism adapted—not without considerable unease from its ...
Examining the populist appeal of Trump, Hidalgo-Tenorio and Benítez-Castro draw on the theories of Ernesto Laclau, writing, "The emotional appeal of populist discourse is key to its polarising effects, this being so much so that populism 'would be unintelligible without the affective component.' (Laclau 2005, 11)" [194] [195]