Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
While Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republic of Macedonia interpreted the breakup of Yugoslavia as a definite replacement of the earlier Yugoslav socialist federation with new sovereign equal successor states, newly established FR Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) claimed that it is sole legal successor entitled to the assets as well as automatic memberships in ...
The Agreement on Succession Issues of the Former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was then signed on 29 June 2001, leading to the sharing of international assets among the five sovereign equal successor states. The FR Yugoslavia was reconstructed on 4 February 2003 as the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro.
The division of such rights and interests shall proceed under the direction of the Standing Joint Committee established under Article 4 of this Agreement. Note: These shares are: 15.50% - Bosnia and Herzegovina 23.00% - Croatia 07.50% - Macedonia 16.00% - Slovenia 38.00% - Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (now: Montenegro, Serbia) Annex D. Article 1
Agreement on ceasefire in Krajina signed at Russian Embassy in Zagreb by Croatian Government and Krajina Serbs. 31 March An agreement was signed in Zagreb between the Serb rebels and the Republic of Croatia on a cease-fire at the line of contact of the Krajina and the Croatian forces. The agreement came into effect on April 4, 1994.
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects ... Agreement on Succession Issues of the Former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia;
The Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties is an international treaty opened for signature in 1978 to set rules on succession of states. It was adopted partly in response to the "profound transformation of the international community brought about by the decolonization process".
The agreement provided for a moratorium on the entry into force of the declarations of independence of Slovenia and Croatia for a period of three months, as well as the need to begin negotiations on the future structure of Yugoslavia. However, the agreement had no impact on the cessation of hostilities in Croatia. [11]
In the meantime, Yugoslavia would theoretically remain a monarchy. Peter II would be the titular head of the country, but he would remain abroad. In his stead, the agreement provided for a council of three regents to represent the king in Yugoslavia, although it was also decided that the agreement would only be signed with the king's approval. [17]