Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Felthouse v Bindley [1862] EWHC CP J35, is the leading English contract law case on the rule that one cannot impose an obligation on another to reject one's offer. This is sometimes misleadingly expressed as a rule that "silence cannot amount to acceptance".
Pages in category "Court of Common Pleas (England) cases" ... Felthouse v Bindley; H. Huber v Steiner; K. Kelner v Baxter; L. Lynch v. Nurdin; M. Mouse's case; S ...
1862 in United States case law (5 P) Pages in category "1862 in case law" The following 5 pages are in this category, out of 5 total. ... Felthouse v Bindley; H ...
Cases concerning agreement in English law and the law of contract. ... Felthouse v Bindley; Frederick E Rose (London) Ltd v William H Pim Junior & Co Ltd; G.
As acceptance must be communicated, the offeror cannot include an Acceptance by Silence clause. This was affirmed in Felthouse v Bindley, [36] here an uncle made an offer to buy his nephew's horse, saying that if he did not hear anything else he would "consider the horse mine". This did not stand up in court, and it was decided there could not ...
Dillwyn v Llewelyn; F. Felthouse v Bindley; H. Habeas Corpus Act 1862; Holroyd v Marshall; M. Milroy v Lord This page was last edited on 22 August 2020, at 05:04 ...
In Beswick v Beswick [9] an uncle's agreement to sell a coal delivery business to his nephew was enforceable. Also, in Errington v Errington, [10] a father's promise to his son and daughter-in-law that they could live in (and ultimately own) a house if they paid off the balance of the mortgage, was an enforceable unilateral contract.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more