When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: why is psychology not considered a science

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Psychology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology

    Psychology is the scientific study of mind and behavior. [1] [2] Its subject matter includes the behavior of humans and nonhumans, both conscious and unconscious phenomena, and mental processes such as thoughts, feelings, and motives. Psychology is an academic discipline of immense scope, crossing the boundaries between the natural and social ...

  3. Psychology of science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology_of_science

    The psychology of science includes research in many subfields of psychology, such as but not limited to neuroscientific, developmental, educational, cognitive, personality, social, and clinical (Feist, 2011). A recent branch of psychology of science investigates attitudes towards science and science skepticism (e.g. Rutjens, Heine et al., 2018 ...

  4. Hard and soft science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_and_soft_science

    Hard science and soft science are colloquial terms used to compare scientific fields on the basis of perceived methodological rigor, exactitude, and objectivity. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] In general, the formal sciences and natural sciences are considered hard science , whereas the social sciences and other sciences are described as soft science .

  5. List of topics characterized as pseudoscience - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics...

    Christian Science is generally considered a Christian new religious movement; however, some have called it "pseudoscience" because its founder, Mary Baker Eddy, used "science" in its name, and because of its former stance against medical science. Also, "Eddy used the term Metaphysical science to distinguish her system both from materialistic ...

  6. Criticism of evolutionary psychology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_evolutionary...

    The history of the debate from a critic's perspective is detailed by Gannon (2002). [2] Critics of evolutionary psychology include the philosophers of science David Buller (author of Adapting Minds), [3] Robert C. Richardson (author of Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology), [4] and Brendan Wallace (author of Getting Darwin Wrong: Why Evolutionary Psychology Won't Work).

  7. Basic science (psychology) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_science_(psychology)

    Classical cognitive psychology has developed an information processing model of mental function, and has been informed by functionalism and experimental psychology. Cognitive science is an interdisciplinary research enterprise that involves cognitive psychologists, cognitive neuroscientists, artificial intelligence, linguists, human–computer ...

  8. Wilhelm Wundt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Wundt

    A representation of Wundt's psychology as 'natural science', 'element psychology' or 'dualistic' conceptions is evidence of enduring misunderstandings. It is therefore necessary to remember Wundt's expressly stated desire for uniformity and lack of contradiction, for the mutual supplementation of psychological perspectives.

  9. Demarcation problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demarcation_problem

    In philosophy of science and epistemology, the demarcation problem is the question of how to distinguish between science and non-science. [1] It also examines the boundaries between science, pseudoscience and other products of human activity, like art and literature and beliefs.