When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. California Democrats delay “Trump-proofing” votes after ...

    www.aol.com/california-democrats-delay-trump...

    (The Center Square) – California Democrats delayed votes on their “Trump-proofing” bills that would have provided $25 million for funding lawsuits against the federal government, and $25 ...

  3. Marsy's Law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsy's_Law

    The Nicholas family was the main organizer of the campaign to pass Marsy's Law, whom former California Governor Pete Wilson called the "driving force" behind the constitutional amendment. [14] In late 2007, Nicholas convened a group, including Wilson, to consider putting a comprehensive victims' rights constitutional amendment on the ballot in ...

  4. 2025 brings handful of new California car laws - AOL

    www.aol.com/2025-brings-three-california-car...

    With the new year comes new laws in California. Specifically, there are at least four related to cars. ... 2025 brings handful of new California car laws. Amanda Quintana. December 30, 2024 at 9: ...

  5. Trump responds to Newsom's plan to protect California laws ...

    www.aol.com/trump-responds-newsoms-plan-protect...

    In a post on Truth Social Friday, Donald Trump blasted California Governor Gavin Newsom's plan to safeguard the state from the president-elect's future policies. Newsom on Thursday called on ...

  6. 2014 California Proposition 47 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_California_Proposition_47

    In 2017, the Los Angeles Times reported that the California Supreme Court ruled that a person convicted of a felony for stealing a car may have that conviction reduced to a misdemeanor if the vehicle was worth no more than $950. [32] In 2018, researchers found that Prop 47 contributed to a jump in car burglaries, shoplifting and other thefts. [33]

  7. Brendlin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendlin_v._California

    Motion to suppress denied; reversed, California Court of Appeal; reversed, 136 P.3d 845 (Cal. 2006); cert. granted, 549 U.S. 1177 (2007). Holding; Automobile passengers are "seized" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when the car in which they are riding is held at a law enforcement traffic stop. California Supreme Court vacated and ...

  8. California v. Carney - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_v._Carney

    California v. Carney , 471 U.S. 386 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that a motor home was subject to the automobile exception to the search warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because the motor home was readily movable.

  9. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us