When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. James Wesley Hendrix - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Wesley_Hendrix

    Between 2004 and 2007, he was an associate at Baker Botts, practicing complex commercial and intellectual-property litigation in state and federal courts. His practice covered a wide range of civil matters, including energy, wage-and-hour, patent, information-technology, real estate, and employment litigation.

  3. Rummel v. Estelle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rummel_v._Estelle

    Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263 (1980), (sometimes erroneously cited as Rummel v.Estell) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld a life sentence with the possibility of parole under Texas' three strikes law for a felony fraud crime, where the offense and the defendant's two prior offenses involved approximately $230 of fraudulent activity (worth $847 in 2023 dollars ...

  4. Chandler v. Florida - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandler_v._Florida

    In an 8-0 decision in favor of the State of Florida, Chief Justice Burger wrote the opinion for the Supreme Court. Citing Estes v. Texas (1964), the Court denied Chandler's claim that a media presence in the courtroom is offensive to due process. So long as the "evolving technology" does not infringe on "fundamental guarantees" of the accused ...

  5. Lofton v. Secretary of the Department of Children & Family ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lofton_v._Secretary_of_the...

    The Court noted that "adoption is not a right; it is a statutory privilege" [2] and that adoption is wholly a creature of the state. It then noted that in "formulating its adoption policies and procedures, the State of Florida acts in the protective and provisional role of in loco parentis for those children who, because of various circumstances, have become wards of the state.

  6. DeVillier v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devillier_v._Texas

    Texas, 601 U.S. 285 (2024), was a case that the Supreme Court of the United States decided on April 16, 2024. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] The case dealt with the Supreme Court's takings clause jurisprudence . Because the case touched on whether or not the 5th Amendment is self-executing, the case had implications for Trump v.

  7. Judiciary of Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_Texas

    West's Texas Cases (a Texas-specific version of the South Western Reporter) includes reported opinions of the Supreme Court, the Court of Criminal Appeals, and the Courts of Appeals. [ 24 ] [ 25 ] The Texas Reports includes Supreme Court opinions until July 1962, and the Texas Criminal Reports includes Court of Criminal Appeals opinions until ...

  8. Supreme Court of Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_Texas

    The Texas Supreme Court consists of a Chief Justice and eight justices. All nine positions are elected, with a term of office of six years and no term limit. The Texas Supreme Court was established in 1846 to replace the Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas. It meets in downtown Austin, Texas in an office building near the Texas State Capitol.

  9. Lawrence v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas

    Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that U.S. state laws criminalizing sodomy between consenting adults are unconstitutional.