When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. No true Scotsman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

    The description of the fallacy in this form is attributed to British philosopher Antony Flew, who wrote, in his 1966 book God & Philosophy, . In this ungracious move a brash generalization, such as No Scotsmen put sugar on their porridge, when faced with falsifying facts, is transformed while you wait into an impotent tautology: if ostensible Scotsmen put sugar on their porridge, then this is ...

  3. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    No true Scotsman (aka appeal to purity) – makes a generalization true by changing the generalization to exclude a counterexample. [ 51 ] Cherry picking (suppressed evidence, incomplete evidence, argument by half-truth, fallacy of exclusion, card stacking, slanting) – using individual cases or data that confirm a particular position, while ...

  4. Antony Flew - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_Flew

    He also developed the No true Scotsman fallacy, [9] and debated retrocausality with Michael Dummett. [ 10 ] However, in 2004 he changed his position, and stated that he now believed in the existence of an intelligent designer of the universe, [ 11 ] shocking colleagues and fellow atheists. [ 11 ]

  5. Argumentation theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentation_theory

    For example, consider the following exchange, illustrating the No true Scotsman fallacy: Argument: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge." Reply: "But my friend Angus, who is a Scotsman, likes sugar with his porridge." Rebuttal: "Well perhaps, but no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."

  6. Texas sharpshooter fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_sharpshooter_fallacy

    The Texas sharpshooter fallacy is an informal fallacy which is committed when differences in data are ignored, but similarities are overemphasized. From this reasoning, a false conclusion is inferred. [1] This fallacy is the philosophical or rhetorical application of the multiple comparisons problem (in statistics) and apophenia (in cognitive ...

  7. Talk:No true Scotsman/Archive 2 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:No_true_Scotsman/...

    4 Example. 3 comments. 5 It's Not a Proper Fallacy. 11 comments. 6 [Untitled] 7 Bad Marker at top of page. 8 Additions to quote. 4 comments. 9 Proposed Section ...

  8. Talk:Logical fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Logical_fallacy

    Calling the "no true Scotsman" argument a fallacy is incorrect. Allow me some examples: A: No person of the Jewish Faith eats pork. R: But my friend Chaim eats pork. Rb: Ah yes, but no true person of the Jewish Faith eats pork. I know several Jews who would consider this a perfectly correct example of the fallacy, as they consider themselves ...

  9. Proof by example - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_example

    The following example demonstrates why this line of reasoning is a logical fallacy: I've seen a person shoot someone dead. Therefore, all people are murderers. In the common discourse, a proof by example can also be used to describe an attempt to establish a claim using statistically insignificant examples. In which case, the merit of each ...