Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The main academic full-text databases are open archives or link-resolution services, although others operate under different models such as mirroring or hybrid publishers. . Such services typically provide access to full text and full-text search, but also metadata about items for which no full text is availa
Cofacts: an open source project associated with the G0v movement [92] [93] [94] MyGoPen : a project run by Taiwanese civil society group. [ 95 ] [ 92 ] It is a signatory to the International Fact-checking Network's codes of principles. [ 96 ]
a list of pre-approved sources that can be always used without regard for the ordinary rules of editing; a list of banned sources that can never be used or should be removed on sight; a list of biased or unbiased sources; a list of sources that are guaranteed to be 100% correct regardless of context; a list of every source that has been discussed
Inclusion on the list doesn't automatically mean the absolute truth is on these websites, so always be critical and compare information between different sources. The content of the subsections is alphabetically organized. Please add free online sources if you know some that are missing in this list, but try to keep it relevant and trustworthy.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
This essay relates to ways to find reliable sources, depending on the particular topic (see below: List of suggested sources). There are the general Wikipedia policies: WP:Reliable sources (WP:RS) - rules about determining reliable sources; WP:Verifiability (WP:V) - rules about writing verifiable text.
Check the list of online newspaper archives (some of which are free to access) or the list of free English newspaper sources. There are also other digitized-newspaper archives, particularly for older articles, that may be available. See if either your local library or TWL provides access to the newspaper or to a database that indexes it in full ...
- Ben Yagoda [4] Here's from a 2012 piece in the Columbia Journalism Review: "To start checking a nonfiction piece, you begin by consulting the writer about how the piece was put together and using the writer’s sources as well as our own departmental sources. We then essentially take the piece apart and put it back together again.