Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In mathematics, exponentiation, denoted b n, is an operation involving two numbers: the base, b, and the exponent or power, n. [1] When n is a positive integer, exponentiation corresponds to repeated multiplication of the base: that is, b n is the product of multiplying n bases: [1] = ⏟.
One of the simplest definitions is: The exponential function is the unique differentiable function that equals its derivative, and takes the value 1 for the value 0 of its variable. This "conceptual" definition requires a uniqueness proof and an existence proof, but it allows an easy derivation of the main properties of the exponential function.
In mathematics, the exponential function can be characterized in many ways. This article presents some common characterizations, discusses why each makes sense, and proves that they are all equivalent. The exponential function occurs naturally in many branches of mathematics. Walter Rudin called it "the most important function in mathematics". [1]
n 4 = n × n × n × n. Fourth powers are also formed by multiplying a number by its cube. Furthermore, they are squares of squares. Some people refer to n 4 as n tesseracted, hypercubed, zenzizenzic, biquadrate or supercubed instead of “to the power of 4”. The sequence of fourth powers of integers, known as biquadrates or tesseractic ...
This complex exponential function is sometimes denoted cis x ("cosine plus i sine"). The formula is still valid if x is a complex number, and is also called Euler's formula in this more general case. [1] Euler's formula is ubiquitous in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and engineering.
a b c = a (b c) which typically is not equal to (a b) c. This convention is useful because there is a property of exponentiation that (a b) c = a bc, so it's unnecessary to use serial exponentiation for this. However, when exponentiation is represented by an explicit symbol such as a caret (^) or arrow (↑), there is no common standard.
Analogously to the real exponential field, there is the complex exponential field, C exp = (C, +, ·, 0, 1, exp). Boris Zilber constructed an exponential field K exp that, crucially, satisfies the equivalent formulation of Schanuel's conjecture with the field's exponential function. [4]
The exponential of a 1×1 matrix is just the exponential of the one entry of the matrix, so exp(J 1 (4)) = [e 4]. The exponential of J 2 (16) can be calculated by the formula e (λ I + N ) = e λ e N mentioned above; this yields [ 23 ]