When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Two more Texas wins in court: sweeping small business ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/two-more-texas-wins-court-182900407.html

    Texas law requires that parents must consent to their child’s medical care. With weeks left in the Biden administration, HHS conceded it will not “enforce the challenged regulation in Texas ...

  3. Hopwood v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopwood_v._Texas

    The court held that "the University of Texas School of Law may not use race as a factor in deciding which applicants to admit in order to achieve a diverse student body, to combat the perceived effects of a hostile environment at the law school, to alleviate the law school's poor reputation in the minority community, or to eliminate any present ...

  4. List of landmark court decisions in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 24 Cal.2d 453, 150 P.2d 436 (1944) Important case in the development of the common law of product liability in the United States based on the concurring opinion of California Supreme Court justice Roger Traynor who stated "that a manufacturer incurs an absolute liability when an article that he has placed on the market ...

  5. Bush v. Vera - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Vera

    Bush v. Vera, 517 U.S. 952 (1996), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning racial gerrymandering, where racial minority majority-electoral districts were created during Texas' 1990 redistricting to increase minority Congressional representation.

  6. Moody v. NetChoice, LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moody_v._NetChoice,_LLC

    Moody and Paxton were challenges to two state statutes – enacted in Florida and Texas, respectively – that sought to limit this moderation. In July 2024, the justices vacated the lower-court decisions in both cases due to both courts failing to perform a full First Amendment assessment of the laws, and remanded them for further consideration.

  7. DeVillier v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devillier_v._Texas

    DeVillier v. Texas, 601 U.S. 285 (2024), was a case that the Supreme Court of the United States decided on April 16, 2024. [1] [2] The case dealt with the Supreme Court's takings clause jurisprudence. Because the case touched on whether or not the 5th Amendment is self-executing, the case had implications for Trump v.

  8. Medicare Advantage disenrollment

    www.aol.com/medicare-advantage-disenrollment...

    Disenrollment is not required in these cases, as private medical insurance companies administer Medigap plans, and as such, are held separately to original Medicare. The best time to sign up for a ...

  9. In effect, Texas law allows two people to fight and injure each other.” To a certain point. Infliction of serious bodily injury nullifies the exemption, and no weapons are allowed.