Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency is a pending United States Supreme Court case about whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without ...
Lawyers for San Francisco told the court it was 'unfair and unworkable' to hold the city potentially liable for huge fines because of polluted water along Pacific beaches near the city.
In siding with the EPA in the San Francisco case last year, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals relied in part on that precedent. The Clean Water Act, enacted in 1972, allows the EPA to set clear ...
Genesis B. v. EPA is a court case filed in the state of California against the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The suit alleges that the EPA "intentionally allows" planet-warming gases to come from sources that it regulates. [1] The lawsuit was filed by Our Children's Trust, the law firm that brought Held v. Montana. [2]
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in California. [1]
The EPA’s civil rights office announced it has accepted a complaint filed by tribes and environmental justice groups, who accuse the State Water Resources Control Board of discriminatory ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Those include in response to columnist E. Jean Carroll’s abuse and defamation claims against him, where the litigator Roberta Kaplan questioned him under oath at Mar-a-Lago.