When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Strict scrutiny - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_scrutiny

    To satisfy the strict scrutiny standard, the law or policy must: be justified by a compelling governmental interest . While the Courts have never brightly defined how to determine if an interest is compelling, the concept generally refers to something necessary or crucial, as opposed to something merely preferred.

  3. Suspect classification - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspect_classification

    To satisfy the strict scrutiny, suspect classifications such as race, alienage, or national origin must be necessary to promote a compelling state interest when there is no less restrictive alternative method available to accomplish the government (state's) interest.

  4. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adarand_Constructors,_Inc...

    Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which held that racial classifications, imposed by the federal government, must be analyzed under a standard of "strict scrutiny", the most stringent level of review which requires that racial classifications be narrowly tailored to further compelling governmental interests. [1]

  5. Rational basis review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_basis_review

    The higher levels of scrutiny are intermediate scrutiny and strict scrutiny. [2] Heightened scrutiny is applied where a suspect or quasi-suspect classification is involved, or a fundamental right is implicated. [1] In U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence, the nature of the interest at issue determines the level of scrutiny applied by appellate ...

  6. Judge strikes down New York minority voting law - AOL

    www.aol.com/judge-strikes-down-york-minority...

    "Where race or national origin is the basis for unequal treatment by the State, as here, the NYVRA must satisfy strict scrutiny, i.e. it must both serve a compelling state interest and be narrowly ...

  7. Substantive due process - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_due_process

    To pass strict scrutiny, the law or the act must be both narrowly tailored and the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling government interest. If the governmental restriction restricts liberty in a manner that does not implicate a fundamental right, rational basis review is used, which determines whether a law or act is rationally ...

  8. After the Scandal: How Public Scrutiny Shaped the ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2010-10-26-careers-of...

    When scandals come to light, they're everywhere. The stories dominate newspaper headlines, talk show topics and broadcast teleprompters for months, running their course in the public eye. But ...

  9. More than a dozen states have passed new laws that led to ...

    www.aol.com/more-dozen-states-passed-laws...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us. Sign in. Mail. ... laws that restrict broad areas of speech must stand up to “strict scrutiny,” a higher level of ...