When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Originalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Originalism

    Originalism is a legal theory that bases constitutional, judicial, and statutory interpretation of text on the original understanding at the time of its adoption. Proponents of the theory object to judicial activism and other interpretations related to a living constitution framework.

  3. Original intent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_intent

    Original intent is a theory in law concerning constitutional and statutory interpretation. It is frequently used as a synonym for originalism; while original intent is one theory in the originalist family, it has some salient differences which has led originalists from more predominant schools of thought such as original meaning to distinguish original intent as much as legal realists do.

  4. Judicial activism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_activism

    The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions (Yale University Press Publishers), 272pp. ISBN 0-300-11468-0; James B. Kelly, July 30, 2006. Governing With the Charter: Legislative And Judicial Activism And Framer's Intent (Law and Society Series) (UBC Press Publishers), 336pp. ISBN 0-7748-1212-5; Rory Leishman, May 2006.

  5. Conservative legal scholars say the Supreme Court’s Trump ...

    www.aol.com/news/originalism-dead-letter-supreme...

    The Supreme Court's decision to grant former President Donald Trump absolute immunity for some of his conduct in seeking to overturn the 2020 election has attracted a chorus of criticism from ...

  6. Judicial minimalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_minimalism

    Largely associated with Cass R. Sunstein, it is a viewpoint which criticizes the more conservative stance of originalism as being judicial activism in disguise. Minimalists believe that a faithful application of originalist theory would result in a system of constitutional law in which modern societal standards would be ignored, in favor of the now-antiquated opinions held by the Founding ...

  7. Justice Kagan is wrong: Conservative Supreme Court ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/justice-kagan-wrong-conservative...

    Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett think they can go back in time to interpret the Constitution. | Opinion

  8. Ideological leanings of United States Supreme Court justices

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideological_leanings_of...

    To further discern the justices' ideological leanings, researchers have carefully analyzed the judicial rulings of the Supreme Court—the votes and written opinions of the justices—as well as their upbringing, their political party affiliation, their speeches, their political contributions before appointment, editorials written about them at the time of their Senate confirmation, the ...

  9. Statutory interpretation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_interpretation

    Rowell, 121 N.M. 111, 114, 908 P.2d 1379, 1382 (1995) When the meaning of a statute is unclear or ambiguous, we have recognized that it is "the high duty and responsibility of the judicial branch of government to facilitate and promote the legislature's accomplishment of its purpose."