Ads
related to: example of malpractice cases in education research paper- Free Citation Generator
Get citations within seconds.
Never lose points over formatting.
- Free Plagiarism Checker
Compare text to billions of web
pages and major content databases.
- Grammarly for Google Docs
Write your best in Google Docs.
Instant writing suggestions.
- Free Punctuation Checker
Fix punctuation and spelling.
Find errors instantly.
- Free Spell Checker
Improve your spelling in seconds.
Avoid simple spelling errors.
- Do Your Best Work
A writing assistant built for work.
Make excellent writing effortless.
- Free Citation Generator
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
As of 2024, Dias has had five of his research papers retracted, and five other papers have received an expression of concern. [271] [272] Victor Ninov (US), a nuclear chemist formerly at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, was dismissed from his position after falsifying his work on the discovery of elements 116 and 118. [273] [274]
A reconstruction of the skull purportedly belonging to the Piltdown Man, a long-lasting case of scientific misconduct. Scientific misconduct is the violation of the standard codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in the publication of professional scientific research.
An example of school exam cheating, a type of academic dishonesty. Academic dishonesty, academic misconduct, academic fraud and academic integrity are related concepts that refer to various actions on the part of students that go against the expected norms of a school, university or other learning institution.
The research began with the selection of 22 subjects from a veterans' orphanage in Iowa. None were told the intent of the research, and they believed that they were to receive speech therapy. The study was trying to induce stuttering in healthy children. The experiment became national news in the San Jose Mercury News in 2001, and a book was ...
Finally, the Markingson case adds to a larger debate about the safety of medical research and the adequacy of the current oversight system. [86] [87] [88] It is one of a number of high-profile studies in recent decades in which research subjects have died or been seriously injured, including the TGN1412 study by PAREXEL in London, the Abduhalli v.
(1) journals with higher impact factors were more likely to reject papers submitted as part of the project; (2) the chances were better, if the manuscript was allegedly based on empirical data; (3) peer reviews can be an important asset in the process of revising a manuscript; and (4) when the project authors, with academic education from ...
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
The paper described MMR vaccination as the "apparent precipitating event", tabulated the parents of eight of the twelve children as linking their developmental symptoms with MMR vaccination, suggested the connection between autism and the gastrointestinal pathologies was "real", and called for further research. [13]
Ad
related to: example of malpractice cases in education research paper