Ad
related to: best books on winning arguments series
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Win Every Argument was described by Noelia Martinez, writing in Library Journal, as a "great resource" for people in academic and corporate environments. [3]Win Every Argument first appeared on The New York Times Best Seller list at #7 for the category of Advice, How-To & Miscellaneous for the week of March 19, 2023.
The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (also The Art of Controversy, or Eristic Dialectic: The Art of Winning an Argument; German: Eristische Dialektik: Die Kunst, Recht zu behalten; 1831) is an acidulous, sarcastic treatise written by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer. [1]
The first book in Ferrante's Neapolitan Novels series, ... The first book in Jemisin's Hugo Award-winning Broken Earth trilogy, set in a world plagued by constant ...
The book follows nine Americans whose unique life experiences with trees bring them together to address the destruction of forests. Through interwoven narratives spanning multiple generations, the novel explores themes of environmental activism, the interconnectedness of living things, and humanity's relationship with the natural world.
Thank You for Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us About the Art of Persuasion is a New York Times bestselling non-fiction book by Jay Heinrichs.
He lauded the book as full of "clever arguments about writing, language, path dependence and so on. It is brimming with wisdom and knowledge, and it is the kind of knowledge economic historians have always loved and admired." [12] Berkeley economic historian Brad DeLong described the book as a "work of complete and total genius". [13]
Tuesdays with Morrie: An Old Man, A Young Man and Life's Greatest Lesson is a 1997 memoir by American author Mitch Albom.The book is about a series of visits Albom made to his former Brandeis University sociology professor, Morrie Schwartz, as Schwartz was dying from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Plato contrasted this type of argument with dialectic and other more reasonable and logical methods (e.g., at Republic 454a). In the dialogue Euthydemus, Plato satirizes eristic. It is more than persuasion, and it is more than discourse. It is a combination that wins an argument without regard to truth.