When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Roach v Electoral Commissioner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roach_v_Electoral_Commissioner

    Roach v Electoral Commissioner [1] [2] is a High Court of Australia case, decided in 2007, dealing with the validity of Commonwealth legislation that prevented prisoners from voting. [ 3 ] [ 4 ] The Court held that the 2006 amendments [ 4 ] were inconsistent with the system of representative democracy established by the Constitution .

  3. M v R - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M_v_R

    M v R or M v The Queen is an Australian legal case decided in the High Court. [1] It is an important authority in the field of criminal law , for the circumstances in which it is permissible for a jury's guilty verdict to be overturned by a judge.

  4. Morgentaler v R - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgentaler_v_R

    Morgentaler v R (also known as Morgentaler v The Queen) is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where physician Henry Morgentaler unsuccessfully challenged the prohibition of abortion in Canada under the federal Criminal Code. The Court found the abortion law was appropriately passed by Parliament under the laws of federalism.

  5. Principle of Legality (Australia) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_Legality...

    Momcilovic v The Queen - in which the court dealt with, among other things, the interaction between the principle of legality and s32(1) of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic); a legislative section that on its face imposes a similar interpretive process to the principle of legality.

  6. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  7. R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Sault_Ste-Marie_(City_of)

    Hearing: October 13, 14, 1977 Judgment: May 1, 1978; Full case name: City of Sault Ste. Marie v. Her Majesty The Queen: Citations [1978] 2 SCR 1299: Court membership

  8. Charles Roach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Roach

    Roach swore allegiance to the Queen of Canada twice before: once as a reservist in the 1950s, and again when he was called to the Bar. [ 7 ] In 1992, Roach argued in the Federal Court of Canada that the Canadian oath for new citizens , which includes a statement of allegiance to the Canadian monarch , was a violation of the Charter of Rights ...

  9. A Florida attorney found himself on the wrong side of the justice system after he allegedly smashed a dinner plate on a man’s head during a wedding reception.

  1. Related searches roach v the queen summary full

    roach v the queen summary full movieroach v the queen summary full book