Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Together with double negation elimination one may infer our originally formulated rule, namely that anything follows from an absurdity. Typically the intuitionistic negation of is defined as . Then negation introduction and elimination are just special cases of implication introduction (conditional proof) and elimination (modus ponens).
Double negation elimination and double negation introduction are two valid rules of replacement. They are the inferences that, if not not-A is true, then A is true, and its converse, that, if A is true, then not not-A is true, respectively. The rule allows one to introduce or eliminate a negation from a formal proof.
Excluded middle and double negation elimination can still be proved for some propositions on a case by case basis, however, but do not hold universally as they do with classical logic. The standard explanation of intuitionistic logic is the BHK interpretation. [1] Several systems of semantics for intuitionistic logic have been studied.
Implication introduction / elimination (modus ponens) Biconditional introduction / elimination; Conjunction introduction / elimination; Disjunction introduction / elimination; Disjunctive / hypothetical syllogism; Constructive / destructive dilemma; Absorption / modus tollens / modus ponendo tollens; Negation introduction; Rules of replacement
move to sidebar hide. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Classical logic is the standard logic of mathematics. Many mathematical theorems rely on classical rules of inference such as disjunctive syllogism and the double negation elimination. The adjective "classical" in logic is not related to the use of the adjective "classical" in physics, which has another meaning.
A negative literal is the negation of an atom (e.g., ). The polarity of a literal is positive or negative depending on whether it is a positive or negative literal. In logics with double negation elimination (where ¬ ¬ x ≡ x {\displaystyle \lnot \lnot x\equiv x} ) the complementary literal or complement of a literal l {\displaystyle l} can ...
The case = now directly shows how double-negation elimination implies consequentia mirabilis over minimal logic. In intuitionistic logic, explosion can be used for ⊥ → ( P ∧ ⊥ ) {\displaystyle \bot \to (P\land \bot )} , and so here the law's special case consequentia mirabilis also implies double-negation elimination.