Ad
related to: the unexamined life is not worth living means not good
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
His "examination" of life in this way spilled out into the lives of others, such that they began their own "examination" of life, but he knew they would all die one day, as saying that a life without philosophy – an "unexamined" life – was not worth living. [4] [5]
"The unexamined life is not worth living" Socrates ( / ˈ s ɒ k r ə t iː z / ; [ 2 ] Ancient Greek : Σωκράτης , romanized : Sōkrátēs ; c. 470 – 399 BC) was a Greek philosopher from Athens who is credited as the founder of Western philosophy [ 3 ] and as among the first moral philosophers of the ethical tradition of thought.
The outcome of the dialogue is that Socrates demonstrates that the other person's views are inconsistent. In this way Socrates tries to show the way to real wisdom. One of his most famous statements in that regard is "The unexamined life is not worth living." This philosophical questioning is known as the Socratic method.
“I enjoy life when things are happening. I don’t care if it’s good things or bad things. That means you’re alive.” — Joan Rivers ... “The unexamined life is not worth living ...
Although I do not suppose that either of us knows anything really beautiful and good, I am better off than he is – for he knows nothing, and thinks he knows. I neither know nor think I know. [Benjamin Jowett translation]. Regardless, the context in which this passage occurs is the same, independently of any specific translation.
Lingis's motto from Abuses (1994) that “The unlived life is not worth examining” is categorically emphasized in these books. [4] Lingis's “phenomenology” monographs, on the other hand, (e.g. The Imperative (1998)) emphasize the Socratic point that “The unexamined life is not worth living.” In many of his books, Alphonso Lingis ...
"The unexamined life is not worth living ... of all men—in effort to illuminate the meaning of the Oracles' categorical statement that he is the wisest man in the ...
The Trial of Socrates (399 BC) was held to determine the philosopher's guilt of two charges: asebeia against the pantheon of Athens, and corruption of the youth of the city-state; the accusers cited two impious acts by Socrates: "failing to acknowledge the gods that the city acknowledges" and "introducing new deities".