Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Castillo v. Case Farms of Ohio, 96 F. Supp. 2d 578 (W.D. Tex. 1999), is a case involving poor working conditions for migratory workers.It established that a principal / agent relationship existed between Case Farms and America's Tempcorps (ATC) that allowed Case Farms to be liable for its agent's actions.
[1] Another definition states that self-fulfillment is "the attainment of a satisfying and worthwhile life well lived." [2] It is an ideal that can be traced to Ancient Greek philosophers, and one that has been common and popular in both Western and non-Western cultures. [1] Self-fulfillment is often considered as superior to other values and ...
Held that an organization may sue in its own right if it has been directly injured, for example through a "drain on the organization's resources", and that so-called "testers", individuals who sought to determine if a company was in violation of the law, may have standing in their own right. [8] 9–0 [9] City of Los Angeles v. Lyons: 1983
Law Enforcement officers stand at the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on July 11, 2022 in Washington, DC. ... In one of the business world’s most closely-watched criminal trials, Silicon Valley ...
The bankruptcy along with the charges brought by US authorities promise to be among the most closely- watched business law stories of 2023. Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance ...
Alan Gewirth (November 28, 1912 – May 9, 2004) was an American philosopher, a professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago, and author of Reason and Morality (1978), Human Rights: Essays on Justification and Applications (1982), The Community of Rights (1996), Self-Fulfillment (1998), and numerous other writings in moral philosophy and political philosophy.
Webster v. Doe (1988) - may not review agency action where "no law to apply." Martin v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (1991) - When adjudication and rule-making power is split between two agencies, court should defer to rule-making agency's interpretations. Auer v.
Cases such as Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc. and Mink v. AAAA Development L.L.C. followed the approach defined by Zippo. However, more recent cases appear to be departing from the Zippo test and relying upon more traditional approaches to personal jurisdiction. [11] For example, the courts in Blakey v. Continental Airlines, Dudnikov v.