When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: why are the gospels credible

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Historical reliability of the Gospels - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of...

    The Gospel of John is a relatively late theological document containing little accurate historical information that is not found in the three synoptic gospels, which is why most historical studies have been based on the earliest sources Mark and Q. [113] Nonetheless, since the third quest, John's gospel is seen as having more reliability than ...

  3. Scholarly interpretation of Gospel elements - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_interpretation...

    The gospels and Christian tradition depict Jesus as being executed at the insistence of Jewish leaders, who considered his claims to divinity to be blasphemous. (See also Responsibility for the death of Jesus ) Fears that enthusiasm over Jesus might lead to Roman intervention is an alternate explanation for his arrest regardless of his preaching.

  4. Historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of...

    Concerning Acts 2, Lüdemann considers the Pentecost gathering as very possible, [52] and the apostolic instruction to be historically credible. [53] Wedderburn acknowledges the possibility of a ‘mass ecstatic experience’, [ 54 ] and notes it is difficult to explain why early Christians later adopted this Jewish festival if there had not ...

  5. Historicity of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible

    There are a number of historical texts outside the gospels showing the bodies of the crucified dead were buried by family or friends. Cook writes that "those texts show that the narrative of Joseph of Arimethaea's burial of Jesus would be perfectly comprehensible to a Greco-Roman reader of the gospels and historically credible." [135]

  6. Historical background of the New Testament - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_background_of...

    Christ Between Peter and Paul, 4th century, Catacomb of Saints Marcellinus and Peter on the Via Labicana Most scholars who study the historical Jesus and early Christianity believe that the canonical gospels and the life of Jesus must be viewed within their historical and cultural context, rather than purely in terms of Christian orthodoxy.

  7. Historicity of Jesus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

    An 11th-century Byzantine manuscript containing the opening of the Gospel of Luke. The synoptic gospels are the primary sources of historical information about Jesus and of the religious movement he founded. [86] [87] The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke recount the life, ministry, crucifixion and resurrection of a Jew named

  8. Historiography of early Christianity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historiography_of_early...

    These gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John recount the life, ministry, crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus. Historians subject the gospels to critical analysis, attempting to differentiate authentic, reliable information from what they judge to be inventions, exaggerations, and alterations.

  9. Four-document hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-document_hypothesis

    The four-document hypothesis or four-source hypothesis is an explanation for the relationship between the three Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. It posits that there were at least four sources to the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke: the Gospel of Mark and three lost sources (Q, M, and L).