When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Medical jurisprudence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_jurisprudence

    Physicians have a duty to act in their patients best interest and can be charged in a court of law if they fail to do so. On the other hand, a physician may be required to act in the interest of third parties if his patient is a danger to others. Failure to do so may lead to legal action against the physician. Medical jurisprudence includes:

  3. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    Four prisoners, Stephen Doody, John David Pierson, Elfed Wayne Smart and Kenneth Pegg, [1] serving mandatory life sentences, requested judicial review after the Home Secretary refused to release them after serving their minimum terms, but gave no reason for the decision.

  4. Judicial review in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_review_in_English_law

    Unlike many other legal systems, English administrative law does not recognise a general duty to give reasons for a decision of a public authority. [33] A duty to give reasons may be imposed by statute. Where it is not, common law may imply such a duty and the courts do so particularly with regard to judicial and quasi-judicial decisions. [34]

  5. Medical malpractice in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_malpractice_in_the...

    A plaintiff must establish all five elements of the tort of negligence for a successful medical malpractice claim. [11] A duty was owed: a legal duty exists whenever a hospital or health care provider undertakes care or treatment of a patient. A duty was breached: the provider failed to conform to the relevant standard care.

  6. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient.

  7. Chief complaint - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_complaint

    It is sometimes also referred to as reason for encounter (RFE), presenting problem, problem on admission or reason for presenting. [ citation needed ] [ 1 ] The chief complaint is a concise statement describing the symptom , problem, condition , diagnosis , physician -recommended return, or other reason for a medical encounter. [ 2 ]

  8. Medical ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_ethics

    Medical ethics is an applied branch of ethics which analyzes the practice of clinical medicine and related scientific research. [1] Medical ethics is based on a set of values that professionals can refer to in the case of any confusion or conflict. These values include the respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. [2]

  9. Medical malpractice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_malpractice

    Medical malpractice is a legal cause of action that occurs when a medical or health care professional, through a negligent act or omission, deviates from standards in their profession, thereby causing injury or death to a patient. [1] The negligence might arise from errors in diagnosis, treatment, aftercare or health management.