Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
If athletes are deemed employees, Phillips believes universities can pay athletes in sports that make revenue (football and basketball) and then, to satisfy Title IX, would pay an “equivalent ...
Top college athletes should be allowed to operate competitively in the open marketplace. In fact, many Division I athletes drive sports programs that generate outrageously large profits for their ...
Presumably, it would start with the athletes in sports that produce most of the revenue: football and men's basketball players at the biggest and wealthiest programs.
Alston, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the compensation of collegiate athletes within the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). It followed from a previous case, O'Bannon v. NCAA, in which it was found that the NCAA was profiting from the namesake and likenesses of college athletes ...
Due to the increasing popularity of college sports because of television and media coverage, some players on college sports teams are receiving compensation from sources other than the NCAA. [32] For instance, CBS paid around $800 million for broadcasting rights to a three-week 2014 men's basketball tournament. [32]
The legal landscape seems increasingly receptive to the idea that college athletes should be compensated for the profits they produce for schools. March Madness brings in millions for colleges ...
College athletes can now make millions before ever going pro thanks to a set of NCAA rules loosening former restrictions on players profiting off NIL, which stands for name, image and likeness.
Since joining the NCAA’s top level, the Panthers have gone 3-29. Curry says he feels bad for the players, but he understands the university’s motivation: Colleges like Georgia State feel tremendous pressure to seize opportunities to enhance their status. As much as anything, he says, it was a play for prestige.