When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Red herring - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring

    The character's name is a loose Italian translation of "red herring" (aringa rosa; rosa actually meaning ' pink ', and very close to rossa, ' red '). [ 9 ] A red herring is found in the first Sherlock Holmes story, A Study in Scarlet , where the murderer writes at the crime scene the word Rache ('revenge' in German), leading the police—and ...

  3. I'm entitled to my opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I'm_entitled_to_my_opinion

    The fallacy is sometimes presented as "let's agree to disagree". [3] Whether one has a particular entitlement or right is irrelevant to whether one's assertion is true or false. Where an objection to a belief is made, the assertion of the right to an opinion side-steps the usual steps of discourse of either asserting a justification of that ...

  4. Appeal to emotion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion

    Appeal to emotion or argumentum ad passiones (meaning the same in Latin) is an informal fallacy characterized by the manipulation of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence. [1]

  5. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    An example of a language dependent fallacy is given as a debate as to who in humanity are learners: the wise or the ignorant. [18]: 3 A language-independent fallacy is, for example: "Coriscus is different from Socrates." "Socrates is a man." "Therefore, Coriscus is different from a man." [18]: 4

  6. Two wrongs don't make a right - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_wrongs_don't_make_a_right

    By invoking the fallacy, the contested issue of lying is ignored (cf. whataboutism). The tu quoque fallacy is a specific type of "two wrongs make a right". Accusing another of not practicing what they preach , while appropriate in some situations, [ a ] does not in itself invalidate an action or statement that is perceived as contradictory.

  7. Whataboutism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

    The communication intent is often to distract from the content of a topic (red herring). The goal may also be to question the justification for criticism and the legitimacy , integrity , and fairness of the critic, which can take on the character of discrediting the criticism, which may or may not be justified.

  8. Mysterious NJ drone activity may be deliberate distraction ...

    www.aol.com/news/expert-fears-drones-smokescreen...

    The enigmatic drones looming over the tri-state area are likely a deliberate distraction by a foreign power trying to hide other nefarious activities in the US, one expert has claimed.

  9. Propaganda techniques - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_techniques

    Red herring Presenting data or issues that, while compelling, are irrelevant to the argument at hand, and then claiming that it validates the argument. [citation needed] In 1807, William Cobbett wrote how he used red herrings to lay a false trail, while training hunting dogs—an apocryphal story that was probably the origin of the idiom ...