When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Contentious - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contentious

    The definition of that is one of the sources of many morasses in the realm of articles on Wikipedia, and especially the biographies of living persons. Some are fairly clear: "John Doe is a racist axe-murderer" would generally conceded to be "contentious" and thus requiring strong reliable sourcing for the claim. Some are less clear-cut:

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

  4. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    Common questions asked of search engines are answered using knowledge ingested from Wikipedia, and often credit or link to Wikipedia as their source. Wikipedia is likely the most important single source used to train generative artificial intelligence (AI) models, such as ChatGPT, for which Wikipedia is valued as a well-curated data set with ...

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    Is it contentious or contested? Does the source indeed support the material? The author. Who is the author? Does the author have a Wikipedia article? What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience? What else has the author published? Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works? How ...

  6. Disputes on Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disputes_on_Wikipedia

    Looking at two contentious topics in French Wikipedia, Shroud of Turin and Sigmund Freud, researchers noticed a shift in focus from the editors' conflicting opinions to their disagreements over encyclopedic sources (e.g., are they scientific) and fellow editors (e.g., did they read the sources). Editors argued in adversarial, not collaborative ...

  7. Wikipedia:List of controversial issues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of...

    This is a list of Wikipedia articles deemed controversial because they are constantly re-edited in a circular manner, or are otherwise the focus of edit warring or article sanctions. This page is conceived as a location for articles that regularly become biased and need to be fixed, or articles that were once the subject of an NPOV dispute and ...

  8. Help:Referencing for beginners - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Referencing_for_beginners

    All quotations, any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, and contentious material (whether negative, positive, or neutral) about living persons must include an inline citation to a source that directly supports the material.

  9. Wikipedia:Template index/Sources of articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Sources_of_articles

    This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libelous