Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Walzer argues in favour of an idea he calls "complex equality", and against the view that goods with different meaning and content can be lumped together into the larger category of primary goods, as is advocated by John Rawls, in his A Theory of Justice (1971). According to Walzer, each sphere has its own internal logic and should be governed ...
The theory posits that inequalities in several spheres of society should not invade one another. [3] Walzer's definition of complex equality is: "In formal terms, complex equality means that no citizen's standing in one sphere or with regard to one social good can be undercut by his standing in some other sphere, with regard to some other good."
In neo-Calvinism, sphere sovereignty (Dutch: soevereiniteit in eigen kring), also known as differentiated responsibility, is the concept that each sphere (or sector) of life has its own distinct responsibilities and authority or competence, and stands equal to other spheres of life. Sphere sovereignty involves the idea of an all encompassing ...
With that in view, it is in this book that he begins to sketch the outlines of his theory of democratic justice. [18] Taking a cue from Michael Walzer's 'Spheres of Justice' [19] Shapiro argues for a “semi-contextualized” approach to the study and pursuit of justice. It varies over time and over the different realms of human social interaction.
(The Center Square) – President-elect Donald Trump has made international headlines by suggesting that Canada could become the 51st state and the U.S. could purchase Greenland. U.S. expansionist ...
John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, 1971; Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, 1974; Michael J. Sandel, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 1982/1998; Michael Walzer, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, 1983; Joseph Raz, The Morality of Freedom, 1986; Paul Ricœur, Lectures on Ideology and Utopia, 1986
His argument for multiple rationales for justice comes in part from his belief in cultural pluralism (there are no universally shared beliefs) but theorists such as Franz Oppenheimer dispute this. A feminist perspective might criticise his separation of spheres of justice. For people who are not engaged in one sphere, they can never receive ...
Just and Unjust Wars has, together with Spheres of Justice (1983) and Interpretation and Social Criticism (1987), been identified as one of Walzer's most important works by the philosopher Will Kymlicka in The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2005). [2]