Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In the philosophy of mind, the phrase often refers to knowledge that can only be acquired through experience, such as, for example, the knowledge of what it is like to see colours, which could not be explained to someone born blind: the necessity of experiential knowledge becomes clear if one was asked to explain to a blind person a colour like blue.
Selective-comparison insight – Identifying information by finding a connection between acquired knowledge and experience. Selective-combination insight – Identifying a problem through understanding the different components and putting everything together.
Experience, when understood in terms of sensation, is of special interest to epistemology. Knowledge based on this form of experience is termed "empirical knowledge" or "knowledge a posteriori". [10] Empiricism is the thesis that all knowledge is empirical knowledge, i.e. that there is no knowledge that does not ultimately rest on sensory ...
The contrast between a posteriori and a priori knowledge plays a central role in the debate between empiricists and rationalists on whether all knowledge depends on sensory experience. [39] The analytic–synthetic distinction has its roots in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. [40] A closely related contrast is between analytic and synthetic ...
Experiential learning can occur without a teacher and relates solely to the meaning-making process of the individual's direct experience. However, though the gaining of knowledge is an inherent process that occurs naturally, a genuine learning experience requires certain elements. [6]
Plato believed that we possess innate ideas that precede any knowledge that we gain through experience. As formulated by Noam Chomsky, accounting for this gap between knowledge and experience is "Plato's problem". The phrase has a specific linguistic context with regard to language acquisition but can also be used more generally.
The distinction between a priori and a posteriori knowledge depends on the role of experience in the processes of formation and justification. [60] To know something a posteriori means to know it based on experience. [61] For example, by seeing that it rains outside or hearing that the baby is crying, one acquires a posteriori knowledge of ...
Empirical evidence is essential to a posteriori knowledge or empirical knowledge, knowledge whose justification or falsification depends on experience or experiment. A priori knowledge, on the other hand, is seen either as innate or as justified by rational intuition and therefore as not dependent on empirical evidence.