Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The high court's decision reverses a 4-1 ruling Aug. 30 by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, which said that the current law, Act 77 of 2019, violates the fundamental right to vote under the ...
“Today’s decision confirms that, for every eligible voter, the right to vote means the right to have your vote counted,” a campaign statement read. ... the Pennsylvania Supreme Court gave ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania consolidated this case with In re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots of November 3, 2020, Gen. Election, [32] and on November 23, affirmed the decision of the decision of the Allegheny County Board of Elections to count the 2,349 ballots at issue.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Monday forbade counties from counting misdated or incorrectly dated mail-in ballots — which election boards in Bucks and Montgomery counties and Philadelphia ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court consists of seven justices, each elected to ten year terms. Supreme Court judicial candidates may run on party tickets. The justice with the longest continuous service on the court automatically becomes Chief Justice. Justices must step down from the Supreme Court when they reach the age of 75 (at the end of the ...
The Supreme Court handed a loss to Republicans by allowing Pennsylvania voters who had sent mail-in ballots that were flagged as being potentially defective to submit a separate provisional in ...
Pennsylvania v. Muniz , 496 US 582 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the Self-incrimination Clause of the 5th Amendment and the meaning of “testimonial” under the 5th Amendment. A drunk-driving suspect, Muniz, made several incriminating statements while in police custody, and the Supreme Court held that only one of these ...
Republicans in the Keystone State filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court just days before the election regarding the state's processing of provisional ballots.