Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Proof without words of the arithmetic progression formulas using a rotated copy of the blocks. An arithmetic progression or arithmetic sequence is a sequence of numbers such that the difference from any succeeding term to its preceding term remains constant throughout the sequence. The constant difference is called common difference of that ...
Sequences dn + a with odd d are often ignored because half the numbers are even and the other half is the same numbers as a sequence with 2d, if we start with n = 0. For example, 6n + 1 produces the same primes as 3n + 1, while 6n + 5 produces the same as 3n + 2 except for the only even prime 2. The following table lists several arithmetic ...
Recamán's sequence: 0, 1, 3, 6, 2, 7, 13, 20, 12, 21, 11, 22, 10, 23, 9, 24, 8, 25, 43, 62, ... "subtract if possible, otherwise add": a(0) = 0; for n > 0, a(n) = a(n − 1) − n if that number is positive and not already in the sequence, otherwise a(n) = a(n − 1) + n, whether or not that number is already in the sequence. A005132: Look-and ...
Equivalently, a sequence is a harmonic progression when each term is the harmonic mean of the neighboring terms. As a third equivalent characterization, it is an infinite sequence of the form 1 a , 1 a + d , 1 a + 2 d , 1 a + 3 d , ⋯ , {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{a}},\ {\frac {1}{a+d}},\ {\frac {1}{a+2d}},\ {\frac {1}{a+3d}},\cdots ,}
Roth's theorem on arithmetic progressions (infinite version): A subset of the natural numbers with positive upper density contains a 3-term arithmetic progression. An alternate, more qualitative, formulation of the theorem is concerned with the maximum size of a Salem–Spencer set which is a subset of [ N ] = { 1 , … , N } {\displaystyle [N ...
For example, the sequence,,,,, … is not an arithmetic progression, but is instead generated by starting with 17 and adding either 3 or 5, thus allowing multiple common differences to generate it. A semilinear set generalizes this idea to multiple dimensions – it is a set of vectors of integers, rather than a set of integers.
Because the sequence of partial sums fails to converge to a finite limit, the series does not have a sum. Although the series seems at first sight not to have any meaningful value at all, it can be manipulated to yield a number of different mathematical results.
The proof of Rademacher's formula involves Ford circles, Farey sequences, modular symmetry and the Dedekind eta function. It may be shown that the k {\displaystyle k} th term of Rademacher's series is of the order exp ( π k 2 n 3 ) , {\displaystyle \exp \left({\frac {\pi }{k}}{\sqrt {\frac {2n}{3}}}\right),} so that the first term gives ...