When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Apparent authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apparent_authority

    Legal jurisdictions which provide for apparent authority include the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada and South Africa.The doctrine of apparent authority is based on the concept of estoppel, thus, it prevents the principal from denying the existence of agency to a third party, provided that a representation, as to the agent's authority, has been made by him to the third ...

  3. Companies Act 2013 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Companies_Act_2013

    It received presidential assent on 29 August 2013, and largely superseded the Companies Act 1956. The Act was brought into force in stages. Section 1 of this act came into force on 30 August 2013. 98 different sections came into force on 12 September 2013 with a few changes. [1] [2] A total of another 183 sections came into force from 1 April ...

  4. Estoppel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estoppel

    Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act defines estoppel: "When one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such belief, neither he nor his representative shall be allowed, in any suit or proceeding between himself and such person or his ...

  5. Indian company law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_company_law

    These included setting up CSR committees and carry-forward mechanisms (previously set out in section 135 of the 2013 Act) and filing of NBFC resolutions with the Registry of Companies (previously set out in section 117 of the 2013 Act). It also provided the framework for exempting specific classes of companies and securities from the definition ...

  6. De facto corporation and corporation by estoppel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_facto_corporation_and...

    De facto corporation and corporation by estoppel are both terms that are used by courts in most common law jurisdictions to describe circumstances in which a business organization that has failed to become a de jure corporation (a corporation by law) will nonetheless be treated as a corporation, thereby shielding shareholders from liability. [1]

  7. The Companies Act, 2013 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=The_Companies_Act,_2013&...

    What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Cite this page; Get shortened URL; Download QR code

  8. Companies (2nd Amendment) Act 2017 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Companies_(2nd_Amendment...

    The introduction of the Companies Act 2013 (2013 Act), which replaced the previous Companies Act 1956, was one of the most important legal reforms in recent years (1956 Act). Though the 2013 Act was a start in the right way by introducing important improvements in areas like disclosures, investor protection, corporate governance, and so on ...

  9. Direct estoppel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_estoppel

    The term "direct estoppel" is used in the Restatement of this Subject to indicate that the binding effect of a judgment as to matters actually litigated and determined in one action applies to a subsequent action between the parties based upon the same cause of action, where the plaintiff is not precluded from maintaining such an action by the ...