Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The corresponding conditional of a valid argument is a logical truth and the negation of its corresponding conditional is a contradiction. The conclusion is a necessary consequence of its premises. An argument that is not valid is said to be "invalid". An example of a valid (and sound) argument is given by the following well-known syllogism:
Validity is defined in classical logic as follows: An argument (consisting of premises and a conclusion) is valid if and only if there is no possible situation in which all the premises are true and the conclusion is false. For example a valid argument might run: If it is raining, water exists (1st premise) It is raining (2nd premise)
A form of argument is valid if and only if the conclusion is true under all interpretations of that argument in which the premises are true. Since the validity of an argument depends on its form, an argument can be shown invalid by showing that its form is invalid. This can be done by a counter example of the same form of argument with premises ...
The validity of an argument in politics can be evaluated in at least two ways: in purely semantic terms or in terms of adherence to certain rules of argument (which we can consider rules of fairness). Semantically, some of the premises used in an argument and the relationships between the assertions in the argument are associated with specific ...
The premise that contains the middle term and major term is called the major premise while the premise that contains the middle term and minor term is called the minor premise. [ 5 ] A premise can also be an indicator word if statements have been combined into a logical argument and such word functions to mark the role of one or more of the ...
A logical fallacy where the conclusion of an argument is assumed in the premise, making the argument circular. Bew See provability predicate. BHK-interpretation The Brouwer-Heyting-Kolmogorov interpretation, a constructivist interpretation of intuitionistic logic, where the truth of a statement is equated with the existence of a proof for it. bias
Every argument's conclusion is a premise of other arguments. The word constituent may be used for either a premise or conclusion. In the context of this article and in most classical contexts, all candidates for consideration as argument constituents fall under the category of truth-bearer : propositions, statements, sentences, judgments, etc.
An argument is valid if, and only if, it is necessary that, if all its premises are true, its conclusion is true. [38] [41] [42] Alternatively, an argument is valid if, and only if, it is impossible for all the premises to be true while the conclusion is false. [42] [38] Validity is contrasted with soundness. [42]