When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Water law in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_law_in_the_United_States

    Therefore, the Court held the water rights were effectively reserved at the time of the reservation's creation. Arizona v. California also concerned the quantity of water reserved. The Supreme Court ruled that the tribes were entitled to enough water to irrigate all the "practicable irrigable acreage" on the reservation.

  3. Arizona v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._California

    The court determined that the Secretary of the Interior was not bound by Prior-appropriation water rights in allocating water among the states, within the 1964 decree. [1] 292 U.S. 341 (1934): Arizona argued that the Colorado River Compact was unconstitutional. 298 U.S. 558 (1936): Arizona requested that the Supreme Court:

  4. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_River_Water...

    In the Southwestern United States, water scarcity was (and remains) a critical problem. The McCarran Amendment, 43 U.S.C. § 666, was a statute enacted by United States Congress in 1952 [2] allowing the United States to be joined as a defendant in certain suits concerning the adjudication or administration of rights to use of waters.

  5. Supreme Court seems split in Navajo Nation water rights case

    www.aol.com/news/court-inclined-toward...

    The Supreme Court seemed split Monday as it weighed a dispute involving the federal government and the Navajo Nation’s quest for water from the drought-stricken Colorado River. States that draw ...

  6. Supreme Court rules against Navajo Nation in Colorado River ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rules-against...

    Arizona, Nevada and Colorado — and water districts in California that are also involved in the case had urged the court to decide for them, which the justices did in a 5-4 ruling. Colorado had ...

  7. Supreme Court limits EPA protection for wetlands, favoring ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-limits-epa...

    In a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court limits federal protection for wetlands in a property rights case, saying the Clean Water Act does not usually apply to the marshy areas.

  8. Winters v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winters_v._United_States

    Winters v. United States, 207 U.S. 564 (1908), was a United States Supreme Court case clarifying water rights of American Indian reservations. [1] This doctrine was meant to clearly define the water rights of indigenous people in cases where the rights were not clear. [2]

  9. The Supreme Court rejects a settlement in a water dispute ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rejects...

    The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a settlement between Western states over the management of one of North America’s longest rivers. In a 5-4 decision, the justices ruled that the water ...