Ads
related to: knowledge sharing echr code lookup search free public recordspublicrecordreports.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Court made awards under Article 41 of the European Convention on Human Rights (just satisfaction) that were substantially lower than those it made in past cases of unlawful detention, since the detention scheme was devised in the face of a public emergency and as an attempt to reconcile the need to protect the United Kingdom public against ...
Courtroom of the European Court of Human Rights (detail).. The European Court of Human Rights is an international tribunal established for enforcement of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Article 6 provides a detailed right to a fair trial, including the right to a public hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal within reasonable time, the presumption of innocence, and other minimum rights for those charged with a criminal offence (adequate time and facilities to prepare their defence, access to legal representation ...
This chart is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship. For more information, see Commons:Threshold of originality § Charts
"The Room at the Top: Separate Opinions in the Grand Chambers of the ECHR (1998‐2006)". Ancilla Iuris: 32– 43. Ó Fathaigh, Ronan (4 July 2014). "A Lesson for Applicants: Don't Agree to a Relinquishment to the Grand Chamber (S.A.S. v. France Part 2)". Strasbourg Observers; Bobek, Michal (8 November 2020).
The ECHR in Strasbourg Prior to the entry into force on 1 June 2010 of Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the EU could not accede to the convention, and thus the European Court of Human Rights did not have jurisdiction to rule on cases brought against the EU.
Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides the right to freedom of expression and information. A fundamental aspect of this right is the freedom to hold opinions and receive and impart information and ideas, even if the receiver of such information does not share the same opinions or views as the provider.
The Court found that Cebotari's detention had been arbitrary (and therefore contrary to Article 5 ECHR), as it was not based upon a 'reasonable suspicion', meaning "the existence of facts or information which would satisfy an objective observer that the person concerned may have committed the offence". [21]