Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Boxplot (with an interquartile range) and a probability density function (pdf) of a Normal N(0,σ 2) Population. In descriptive statistics, the interquartile range (IQR) is a measure of statistical dispersion, which is the spread of the data. [1] The IQR may also be called the midspread, middle 50%, fourth spread, or H‑spread.
This example calculates the five-number summary for the following set of observations: 0, 0, 1, 2, 63, 61, 27, 13. These are the number of moons of each planet in the Solar System . It helps to put the observations in ascending order: 0, 0, 1, 2, 13, 27, 61, 63.
where is the interquartile range of the data and is the number of observations in the sample . In fact if the normal density is used the factor 2 in front comes out to be ∼ 2.59 {\displaystyle \sim 2.59} , [ 4 ] but 2 is the factor recommended by Freedman and Diaconis.
Common examples of measures of statistical dispersion are the variance, standard deviation, and interquartile range. For instance, when the variance of data in a set is large, the data is widely scattered. On the other hand, when the variance is small, the data in the set is clustered.
One of the most common robust measures of scale is the interquartile range (IQR), the difference between the 75th percentile and the 25th percentile of a sample; this is the 25% trimmed range, an example of an L-estimator. Other trimmed ranges, such as the interdecile range (10% trimmed range) can also be used.
Figure 2. Box-plot with whiskers from minimum to maximum Figure 3. Same box-plot with whiskers drawn within the 1.5 IQR value. A boxplot is a standardized way of displaying the dataset based on the five-number summary: the minimum, the maximum, the sample median, and the first and third quartiles.
Aickin's α; Andres and Marzo's delta; Bangdiwala's B; Bennett, Alpert, and Goldstein’s S; Brennan and Prediger’s κ; Coefficient of colligation - Yule's Y; Coefficient of consistency
The range, T, has the cumulative distribution function [3] [4] = [(+) ()].Gumbel notes that the "beauty of this formula is completely marred by the facts that, in general, we cannot express G(x + t) by G(x), and that the numerical integration is lengthy and tiresome."