When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. California v. Byers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_v._Byers

    California v. Byers , 402 U.S. 424 (1971), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States decided that providing personal information at the scene of an accident does not infringe on one's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination .

  3. Brendlin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendlin_v._California

    Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that all occupants of a car are "seized" for purposes of the Fourth Amendment during a traffic stop, not just the driver.

  4. 2014 California Proposition 47 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_California_Proposition_47

    In 2017, the Los Angeles Times reported that the California Supreme Court ruled that a person convicted of a felony for stealing a car may have that conviction reduced to a misdemeanor if the vehicle was worth no more than $950. [32] In 2018, researchers found that Prop 47 contributed to a jump in car burglaries, shoplifting and other thefts. [33]

  5. Shocking clues our cars may be giving to criminals - AOL

    www.aol.com/article/2015/02/24/shocking-clues...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. California v. Acevedo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_v._Acevedo

    California v. Acevedo , 500 U.S. 565 (1991), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court , which interpreted the Carroll doctrine to provide one rule to govern all automobile searches. The Court stated, "The police may search an automobile and the containers within it where they have probable cause to believe contraband or evidence is ...

  7. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    This was the first time that the Supreme Court reversed a state criminal conviction due to a violation of a constitutional provision concerning criminal procedure. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886) Racially discriminatory application of a racially neutral statute violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Plessy v.

  8. 2025 brings handful of new California car laws - AOL

    www.aol.com/2025-brings-three-california-car...

    OAKLAND, Calif. - With the new year comes new laws in California. Specifically, there are at least four related to cars. Let's take a look at what takes effect on Jan. 1. Parking near a crosswalk

  9. California, Hawaii can ban guns in bars and parks, appeals ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-hawaii-ban-guns-bars...

    California and Hawaii can enforce bans on carrying guns in some public locations including bars and parks, a federal appeals court ruled on Friday, partly reversing lower court orders blocking the ...