Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., 563 U.S. 776 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that title in a patented invention vests first in the inventor, even if the inventor is a researcher at a federally funded lab subject to the 1980 Bayh–Dole Act. [1]
Stanford v. Roche, [25] was a case decided by the Supreme Court that held that title in a patented invention vests first in the inventor, even if the inventor is a researcher at a federally funded lab subject to the Bayh–Dole Act. [26]
The Seagate two-part test that required both objective and subjective bases is overruled. This case reviewed both Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc., both of which used the Seagate two-part test to determine willful infringement as the basis for deciding enhanced damages per Section 284.
Swiss pharmaceutical company Roche has settled a patent lawsuit against U.S. biotech firm Biogen over its biosimilar version of Roche's blockbuster rheumatoid arthritis drug Actemra, according to ...
Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Z. Zurcher v. Stanford Daily This page was last edited on 18 March 2023, at 16:17 (UTC). Text ...
Case name Citation Date decided Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. 563 U.S. 1: March 22, 2011 Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano: 563 U.S. 27
A lawsuit has accused Stanford University of systematic negligence in failing to stop years of sexual assault against multiple female students.
Roche, the court decided that Roche, a former Stanford researcher, was a co-owner with Stanford of patents for testing kits to detect HIV. [24] While this case does not deal with digital scholarship directly, it deals with the ownership of intellectual property of university employees when they leave.