Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
It's my down home way of saying that something may be cost-effective but not be cost-effecient. Cost-effective is basically "economical" -- can you get more money back than you paid for it. Cost-effecient is basically "productivity" --- did you waste resources relative to "cost". Both of these factors have to be weighed in business to determine ...
The speaker may be unsure whether or not bringing the toy ring (to be buried - is that what is happening here?) was more cost-efficient, or they may be saying that it was not more cost-efficient. My guess is that the writer has chosen the wrong expression in "if not", and "cost-efficient" is an odd choice as well.
The objective of the project is to be cost effective and cost efficient. If cost effective is rentable, what would cost efficient be in French?
"The process brings together several components to create a system that delivers a cost efficient solution for advisors and their clients." "Processus" sounds strange, I find "mode opératoire" more adapted. May be "cost efficient solution" have a good translation with "maîtrise des coûts or...
Colorado Springs, Colorado U.S.A. U.S.A., English. Jun 10, 2006. #2. Chíaíaía, WordReference ha tenido este hilo previo sobre "cost-effective". Para mí, esta oración quiere decir lo mismo que "cost-efficient." Creo que puedes encontrar lo que nececitas allí. Ojalá que esto sea de ayuda.
Spanish - Argentina, English - USA. Oct 4, 2017. #6. Normandete said: As I see it cost-efficent is an adjective while cost effciency is a noun. In the sentence I introduced, I think a noun will be more correct. Cost-efficiency is correct; you're talking about factors relating to the efficiency of costs, not factors that are efficient.
Cost-efficient and Cost-effective. Thread starter Youzpalang; Start date Oct 1, 2021; Youzpalang Senior ...
The fourth defendant characterized the plaintiff’s motion to allow the fourth defendant to join the proceeding as a not cost-efficient procedure/procedure which is not cost effective. Hi which of these do you prefer? thanks, A.
May 28, 2011. #3. In many situations, DeivDave, either preposition means the same thing. Here's such an example: She's efficient at everything she does. She's efficient in everything she does. Both sentences mean the same thing. In your examples, I like the prepositions as they are used. Efficient at finding gold (in is possible).
Originally this was quoted from English grammar workbook and the learner was to select incorrect one out of 4. "it (1.cost the company $10,000) to equip (2 its 3,000 -square-feet home) with (3.all the wiring), 15 or so phone jacks , alarm systems and (4.a central distribution panel fed)by high-speed cable." Of course the answer was #2.