Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Leser v. Garnett, 258 U.S. 130 (1922), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Nineteenth Amendment was constitutional. [1]
Supreme Court of the United States 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 Established March 4, 1789 ; 235 years ago (1789-03-04) Location Washington, D.C. Coordinates 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 Composition method Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation Authorised by ...
Case name Citation Summary United States v. Phellis: 257 U.S. 156 (1921) shares in a subsidiary corporation issued to stockholders in the parent corporation considered taxable income: Leser v. Garnett: 258 U.S. 130 (1922) constitutionality of Nineteenth Amendment: Balzac v. Porto Rico: 258 U.S. 298 (1922) sometimes considered one of the Insular ...
Fairchild v. Hughes, 258 U.S. 126 (1922), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a general citizen, in a state that already had women's suffrage, lacked standing to challenge the validity of the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment. [1] A companion case, Leser v. Garnett, upheld the ratification. [2] [3] [4]
United States Supreme Court: 1994 Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. statute of limitations on pay discrimination: Supreme Court of the United States: 2007 Leser v. Garnett: right to vote: Supreme Court of the United States: 1922 Mauldin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. health insurance not covering prescription contraceptives
Tax protester Sixteenth Amendment arguments are assertions that the imposition of the U.S. federal income tax is illegal because the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which reads "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration ...
3 Leser v. Garnett. 1 comment. 4 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floyd Abrams and the Pentagon Papers case. 1 comment. 5 ...
The bill also proposed to amend the Act to overturn two recent Supreme Court cases: Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board (2000), [9] which interpreted Section 5 to prohibit voting changes that were enacted or maintained for a "retrogressive" purpose instead of any discriminatory purpose, and Georgia v.