When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: king james version controversy

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. King James Only movement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Only_movement

    The exclusive use of the King James Version is recorded in a statement made by the Tennessee Association of Baptists in 1817, stating "We believe that any person, either in a public or private capacity who would adhere to, or propagate any alteration of the New Testament contrary to that already translated by order of King James the 1st, that is now in common in use, ought not to be encouraged ...

  3. Bible version debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_version_debate

    The English King James Version or "Authorized Version", published in 1611, has been one of the most debated English versions. Many supporters of the King James Version are disappointed with the departure from this translation to newer translations that use the critical text instead of the Byzantine text as

  4. An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Historical_Account_of...

    The shorter portion of Newton's dissertation was concerned with 1 Timothy 3:16, which reads (in the King James Version): . And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

  5. King James Only Controversy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Only_Controversy

    King James Only Controversy may refer to: . King James Only Controversy, a book by theologian James White about the controversy over the King-James-Only movement.; The King-James-Only Movement, a controversy within English speaking Protestant evangelicalism between those who espouse only using the King James Version of the Bible, and those who allow the use of other modern translations of the ...

  6. Criticism of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible

    The King-James-Only Movement rejects these changes and upholds the King James Version as the most accurate. [ 70 ] In a 1973 Journal of Biblical Literature article, Philip B. Harner, Professor Emeritus of Religion at Heidelberg College , claimed that the traditional translation of John 1:1c ("and the Word was God" and one of the most frequently ...

  7. Biblical inerrancy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_inerrancy

    However, King James Version (KJV)-only inerrantists often prefer the traditional texts (i.e., Textus Receptus, which is the basis of KJV) used in their churches to modern attempts of reconstruction (i.e., Nestle-Aland Greek Text, which is the basis of modern translations), arguing that the Holy Spirit is just as active in the preservation of ...

  8. Apocrypha controversy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocrypha_Controversy

    The contents page in a complete 80 book King James Bible, listing "The Books of the Old Testament", "The Books called Apocrypha", and "The Books of the New Testament". The Apocrypha controversy of the 1820s was a debate around the British and Foreign Bible Society and the issue of the inclusion of the Apocrypha in Bibles it printed for ...

  9. King James Version - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Version

    John Speed's Genealogies recorded in the Sacred Scriptures (1611), bound into first King James Bible in quarto size (1612). The title of the first edition of the translation, in Early Modern English, was "THE HOLY BIBLE, Conteyning the Old Teſtament, AND THE NEW: Newly Tranſlated out of the Originall tongues: & with the former Tranſlations diligently compared and reuiſed, by his Maiesties ...