When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: most recent trademark infringement cases examples

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of United States Supreme Court trademark case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    A jury is competent to decide the legal issue of damages stemming from breach of contract or trademark infringement, so long as the accounts between the parties are not so complicated that only acourt of equity could untangle such accounts. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. 376 U.S. 225: March 9, 1964: 9–0 Substantive: Unfair competition

  3. Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Daniel's_Properties...

    Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 599 U.S. 140 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case involving parody and trademark law.The case deals with a dog toy shaped similar to a Jack Daniel's whiskey bottle and label, but with parody elements, which Jack Daniel's asserts violates their trademark.

  4. List of trademark case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trademark_case_law

    KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I. Inc. 543 U.S. 111, 124 (2004) ("a plaintiff claiming infringement of an incontestable mark must show likelihood of consumer confusion as part of the prima facie case, ... while the defendant has no independent burden to negate the likelihood of any confusion in raising the affirmative defense ...

  5. ‘Yellowstone’ creator and actor battle over coffee company’s logo

    www.aol.com/finance/yellowstone-creator-actor...

    Not a ‘slam-dunk case’ Attorney Josh Gerben told CNN that trademark infringement cases are “typically very close calls and depend heavily on the evidence the parties are able to bring forth ...

  6. Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romag_Fasteners,_Inc._v...

    Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case related to trademark law under the Lanham Act.In the 9–0 decision on judgement, the Court ruled that a plaintiff in a trademark infringement lawsuit is not required to demonstrate that the defendant willfully infringed on their trademark to claim lost profit damages.

  7. Trademark infringement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark_infringement

    An accounting of profits is proper in a trademark infringement case only where the defendant engages in willful infringement, meaning that the defendant attempted to exploit the value of an established name of another. [45] Alternatively, a plaintiff may recover damages incurred if they show a reasonable forecast of lost profits.

  8. Category:United States trademark case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States...

    Pages in category "United States trademark case law" The following 68 pages are in this category, out of 68 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. ...

  9. US trade tribunal finds Lenovo smartphones infringe Ericsson ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-trade-tribunal-finds-lenovo...

    The U.S. International Trade Commission said on Tuesday that smartphones made by Lenovo's Motorola Mobility infringe patents owned by Ericsson, which could lead to a ban on U.S. imports of the ...