Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 18 February 2025. This article's lead section may be too long. Please read the length guidelines and help move details into the article's body. (January 2021) This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable ...
Sham peer review or malicious peer review is a name given to the abuse of a medical peer review process to attack a doctor for personal or other non-medical reasons. [1] The American Medical Association conducted an investigation of medical peer review in 2007 and concluded that while it is easy to allege misconduct and 15% of surveyed physicians indicated that they were aware of peer review ...
IMHS (Institute of Metaphysical Humanistic Science) Metaphysics Institute, Florida; cross-operated alongside Thomas Francis University by the unaccredited International Church of Metaphysical Humanism, Inc. [214] Indian Institute of Alternative Medicine, India [215] [216] Indian Institute of Alternative Medicine and Research, India [215] [216]
An institutional review board (IRB), also known as an independent ethics committee (IEC), ethical review board (ERB), or research ethics board (REB), is a committee at an institution that applies research ethics by reviewing the methods proposed for research involving human subjects, to ensure that the projects are ethical. The main goal of IRB ...
Clinical peer review, also known as medical peer review is the process by which health care professionals, including those in nursing and pharmacy, evaluate each other's clinical performance. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] A discipline-specific process may be referenced accordingly (e.g., physician peer review , nursing peer review ).
A new review reports that nine people taking semaglutide and tirzepatide — the active ingredient in GLP-1 medications — experienced vision issues, including three potentially blinding eye ...
Ratings are updated yearly, but data is two years old before Medicare releases it. [1] [18] [19] Healthgrades develops objective ratings based on data and information from several publicly available sources. [18] The data is analyzed using a proprietary methodology that identifies the recipients of the various awards and the "1-3-5 Star ...
Various journal review websites (crowd-sourced or expert-run) have been started, some focusing on the quality of the peer review process and extending to non-OA publications. [128] [129] A group of libraries and publishers launched an awareness campaign. [130] [131] A number of measures have been suggested to further combat predatory journals.