When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. I know it when I see it - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it

    This simple phrase, embedded in a plurality opinion, carries with it many of the conflicts and inconsistencies that continue to plague American obscenity law. In effect, "I know it when I see it" can still be paraphrased and unpacked as: "I know it when I see it, and someone else will know it when they see it, but what they see and what they ...

  3. United States v. Williams (2008) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Williams...

    United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography [1] (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child ...

  4. United States v. Solon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Solon

    United States v. Solon, 596 F.3d 1206 (10th Cir. 2010), [1] was a case in which Nathaniel Solon, a resident of Casper, Wyoming, was convicted for possession of child pornography. The case became known in the media for irregularities in the process, and suspicions (affirmed by the defendant) that the material was introduced by malware on the ...

  5. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._X...

    United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64 (1994), was a federal criminal prosecution filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles against X-Citement Video and its owner, Rubin Gottesman, on three charges of trafficking in child pornography, specifically videos featuring the underaged Traci Lords.

  6. United States v. Stevens - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Stevens

    United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which ruled that 18 U.S.C. § 48, [1] a federal statute criminalizing the commercial production, sale, or possession of depictions of cruelty to animals, was an unconstitutional abridgment of the First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

  7. Connick v. Thompson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connick_v._Thompson

    Handling both cases, the district attorney of the Parish of Orleans, Harry Connick Sr., chose to first bring to trial the armed robbery charge against Thompson in hopes that a conviction would help with the murder case. Based solely on the identification by the three victims, Thompson was found guilty of attempted armed robbery and sentenced to ...

  8. SNL’s Trump hilariously impersonates ex-president’s ‘reaction ...

    www.aol.com/snl-trump-hilariously-reacts-guilty...

    Saturday Night Live’s Donald Trump was resurrected after the former president was found guilty in a high-profile hush-money trial.. Many celebrities, including Robert De Niro, are all reacting ...

  9. Amy, Vicky, and Andy Child Pornography Victim Assistance Act ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy,_Vicky,_and_Andy_Child...

    It creates a Child Pornography Victims Reserve Fund within the federal Crime Victims Fund using assessments from defendants convicted of child pornography offenses and set-aside funds. [7] Victims of child pornography trafficking are entitled to receive a one-time payment of $35,000 from this fund instead of fighting for restitution if they so ...