Ads
related to: dividing three fractions
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The picture to the right illustrates 3 / 4 of a cake. Fractions can be used to represent ratios and division. [1] Thus the fraction 3 / 4 can be used to represent the ratio 3:4 (the ratio of the part to the whole), and the division 3 ÷ 4 (three divided by four).
In abstract algebra, given a magma with binary operation ∗ (which could nominally be termed multiplication), left division of b by a (written a \ b) is typically defined as the solution x to the equation a ∗ x = b, if this exists and is unique. Similarly, right division of b by a (written b / a) is the solution y to the equation y ∗ a = b ...
A unit fraction is a positive fraction with one as its numerator, ... subtracting, [3] or dividing two unit fractions produces a result that is generally not a unit ...
Other symbols for division include the slash or solidus /, the colon:, and the fraction bar (the horizontal bar in a vertical fraction). [3] [4] The ISO 80000-2 standard for mathematical notation recommends only the solidus / or "fraction bar" for division, or the "colon" : for ratios; it says that the ÷ sign "should not be used" for division. [1]
Long division is the standard algorithm used for pen-and-paper division of multi-digit numbers expressed in decimal notation. It shifts gradually from the left to the right end of the dividend, subtracting the largest possible multiple of the divisor (at the digit level) at each stage; the multiples then become the digits of the quotient, and the final difference is then the remainder.
An extension to the rule of three was the double rule of three, which involved finding an unknown value where five rather than three other values are known. An example of such a problem might be If 6 builders can build 8 houses in 100 days, how many days would it take 10 builders to build 20 houses at the same rate? , and this can be set up as
In the second step, they were divided by 3. The final result, 4 / 3 , is an irreducible fraction because 4 and 3 have no common factors other than 1. The original fraction could have also been reduced in a single step by using the greatest common divisor of 90 and 120, which is 30. As 120 ÷ 30 = 4, and 90 ÷ 30 = 3, one gets
Dividing by Q(x) this gives () = + (), and then seek partial fractions for the remainder fraction (which by definition satisfies deg R < deg Q). If Q ( x ) contains factors which are irreducible over the given field, then the numerator N ( x ) of each partial fraction with such a factor F ( x ) in the denominator must be sought as a polynomial ...