When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of TLS implementations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_TLS...

    A workaround for SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0, roughly equivalent to random IVs from TLS 1.1, was widely adopted by many implementations in late 2011. [30] In 2014, the POODLE vulnerability of SSL 3.0 was discovered, which takes advantage of the known vulnerabilities in CBC, and an insecure fallback negotiation used in browsers.

  3. Transport Layer Security - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security

    Although this vulnerability only exists in SSL 3.0 and most clients and servers support TLS 1.0 and above, all major browsers voluntarily downgrade to SSL 3.0 if the handshakes with newer versions of TLS fail unless they provide the option for a user or administrator to disable SSL 3.0 and the user or administrator does so [citation needed].

  4. TLS termination proxy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TLS_termination_proxy

    Incoming HTTPS traffic gets decrypted and forwarded to a web service in the private network. A TLS termination proxy (or SSL termination proxy, [1] or SSL offloading [2]) is a proxy server that acts as an intermediary point between client and server applications, and is used to terminate and/or establish TLS (or DTLS) tunnels by decrypting and/or encrypting communications.

  5. Comparison of email clients - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_email_clients

    The following tables compare general and technical features of notable non-web-based email client programs. ... [Note 3] SSL TLS ... HTML email UTF-8 support

  6. Network Security Services - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_Security_Services

    The Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol from the IETF supersedes SSL v3.0 while remaining backward-compatible with SSL v3 implementations. SSL 3.0. The Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol allows mutual authentication between a client and server and the establishment of an authenticated and encrypted connection. DTLS 1.0 (RFC 4347) and 1.2 ...

  7. Comparison of MQTT implementations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_MQTT...

    The following table lists the versions of MQTT that each implementation supports, and also lists their support for SSL/TLS and TCP. The security provided by SSL/TLS may be desirable depending on the type traffic being sent between devices, as MQTT transmits messages in the clear .

  8. OpenSSL - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL

    OpenSSL is a software library for applications that provide secure communications over computer networks against eavesdropping, and identify the party at the other end. It is widely used by Internet servers, including the majority of HTTPS websites.

  9. Talk:Comparison of TLS implementations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Comparison_of_TLS...

    Also, one has to ask oneself why the BSAFE C TLS implementation (MES) and the BSAFE Java TLS implementation (SSL-J) have both been listed in this comparison of TLS implementation since January 12, 2015, in for more than 6 years without any objection whatsoever until two weeks ago.

  1. Related searches ssl tls difference between 3 tables and 6 comparison points in html js

    ssl tls difference between 3 tables and 6 comparison points in html js code