Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In logic, two propositions and are mutually exclusive if it is not logically possible for them to be true at the same time; that is, () is a tautology. To say that more than two propositions are mutually exclusive, depending on the context, means either 1. "() () is a tautology" (it is not logically possible for more than one proposition to be true) or 2. "() is a tautology" (it is not ...
mutually exclusive: nothing can belong simultaneously to both parts. If there is a concept A, and it is split into parts B and not-B, then the parts form a dichotomy: they are mutually exclusive, since no part of B is contained in not-B and vice versa, and they are jointly exhaustive, since they cover all of A, and together again give A.
The following table lists many common symbols, together with their name, how they should be read out loud, and the related field of mathematics. Additionally, the subsequent columns contains an informal explanation, a short example, the Unicode location, the name for use in HTML documents, [ 1 ] and the LaTeX symbol.
In logic, the law of non-contradiction (LNC) (also known as the law of contradiction, principle of non-contradiction (PNC), or the principle of contradiction) states that contradictory propositions cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time, e. g. the two propositions "the house is white" and "the house is not white" are mutually exclusive.
When heads occurs, tails can't occur, or p (heads and tails) = 0, so the outcomes are also mutually exclusive. Another example of events being collectively exhaustive and mutually exclusive at same time are, event "even" (2,4 or 6) and event "odd" (1,3 or 5) in a random experiment of rolling a six-sided die. These both events are mutually ...
The outcomes must be mutually exclusive, i.e. if occurs, then no other will take place, , =,, …,. [ 6 ] The outcomes must be collectively exhaustive , i.e. on every experiment (or random trial) there will always take place some outcome s i ∈ Ω {\displaystyle s_{i}\in \Omega } for i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , n } {\displaystyle i\in \{1,2,\ldots ...
In other words, the notion of "contradiction" can be dispensed when constructing a proof of consistency; what replaces it is the notion of "mutually exclusive and exhaustive" classes. An axiomatic system need not include the notion of "contradiction". [12]: 177
The law of total probability is [1] a theorem that states, in its discrete case, if {: =,,, …} is a finite or countably infinite set of mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive events, then for any event