Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Here, the construct : re(0), im(0) is the initializer list. Sometimes the term "initializer list" is also used to refer to the list of expressions in the array or struct initializer. C++11 provides for a more powerful concept of initializer lists, by means of a template, called std::initializer_list.
However, C++03 allows initializer-lists only on structs and classes that conform to the Plain Old Data (POD) definition; C++11 extends initializer-lists, so they can be used for all classes including standard containers like std::vector. C++11 binds the concept to a template, called std::initializer_list. This allows constructors and other ...
Assignments occur according to the order in which data members are declared (even if the order in the initializer list is different). [3] The second part is the body, which is a normal method body enclosed in curly brackets. C++ allows more than one constructor. The other constructors must have different parameters.
Zero initialization with {} (including initialization of VLAs). [42] Variadic functions no longer need a named argument before the ellipsis and the va_start macro no longer needs a second argument nor does it evaluate any argument after the first one if present. [43] Add C++11 style attribute syntax [44] using double square brackets [[]].
For this purpose, the C++11 standard library defines the smart pointer classes std::unique_ptr for single-owned objects and std::shared_ptr for objects with shared ownership. Similar classes are also available through std::auto_ptr in C++98, and boost::shared_ptr in the Boost libraries. Also, messages can be sent to network resources using RAII.
The most vexing parse is a counterintuitive form of syntactic ambiguity resolution in the C++ programming language. In certain situations, the C++ grammar cannot distinguish between the creation of an object parameter and specification of a function's type. In those situations, the compiler is required to interpret the line as a function type ...
C++ changes some C standard library functions to add additional overloaded functions with const type qualifiers, e.g. strchr returns char* in C, while C++ acts as if there were two overloaded functions const char *strchr(const char *) and a char *strchr(char *). In C23 generic selection is used to make C's behaviour more similar to C++'s. [11]
Initialization of STL containers with constants within the source code is not as easy as data structures inherited from C (addressed in C++11 with initializer lists). STL containers are not intended to be used as base classes (their destructors are deliberately non-virtual); deriving from a container is a common mistake. [9] [10]